Publication Notices

Notifications of New Publications Released by ERDC

Contact Us

      

  

    866.362.3732

   601.634.2355

 

ERDC Library Catalog

Not finding what you are looking for? Search the ERDC Library Catalog

Results:
Tag: Shorelines
Clear
  • Multi-Temporal Geomorphic Change and Application of the Coastal Engineering Resilience Index Along the Mississippi Mainland Beaches and Dunes

    Abstract: This report addresses the Mobile District’s request for a representative resilient beach and dune profile for the Mississippi mainland beach and dune project. The report summarizes a workflow that uses a custom ArcGIS Pro toolbox and 10 lidar datasets spanning a 22-year period of analysis. The workflow involves (1) lidar data compilation; (2) the extraction of geomorphic features, such as shorelines and dune toes and crests, on over 5,800 profiles along the Mississippi mainland coast; (3) the calculation of Coastal Engineering Resilience Index values for each transect for each lidar dataset; (4) selection of representative resilient profiles for various datasets; (5) development of synthetic profiles and Coastal Engineering Resilience Index (CERI) calculations on those profiles; and (6) data delivery and the development of a Web service hosting the project outcomes. The results of these analyses indicate that the protective width (i.e., from the shoreline to the seawall along the coast) is a major contributor to the resilience of a given section of beach. However, the resilience of these estuarine beaches can also be enhanced by increasing protective elevation. Overall, the work demonstrates the value of applying these workflows and toolboxes during the engineering planning and design phase.
  • Evaluation of Shore Protection Alternatives at Crescent Beach, Indiana

    Abstract: This report documents a numerical modeling investigation of shore protection alternatives at Crescent Beach, Indiana. The integrated flow, wave, sediment transport, and morphology change Coastal Modeling System (CMS) and the long-term shoreline evolution model, GenCade, were applied to evaluate alternatives. Sediment, elevation, and hydrodynamic data were collected nearby to improve model calibration and validation. Eight alternatives were evaluated, with coastal structures in four, beach nourishments in three, and one with both. Structures other than the continuous rubble ridge (Alternative 4) had minimal or negative influences on sediment transport. Stone sizes and costs were estimated for Alternative 4 using StormSim and extremal forcing from the Coastal Hazards System (CHS) Great Lakes Study, but CMS does not predict impacts that justify rubble ridge construction costs. CMS and GenCade were applied to beach nourishments across a range of volume and sediment grain size distributions. Model evaluations indicate that beach nourishment is the most effective shoreline protection technique, using coarse sand mixed with small stones to achieve a median grain size (d50) of 1.80 millimeters successfully extends the beach nourishment lifecycle, and increasing nourishment volume to 87,455 cubic meters to span in front of Mount Baldy substantially increases downdrift benefits.
  • Conceptual Sediment Budget Creation Using CorpsCam Imagery: Holland Harbor, Michigan

    Abstract: This Regional Sediment Management (RSM) technical note (TN) discusses the development of a conceptual sediment budget at Holland Harbor, Michigan, using CorpsCam imagery. Imagery from May 2020 through October 2021 was analyzed to calculate volume change along Ottawa Beach, just north of the entrance to Holland Harbor. Shoaling rates and longshore sediment transport rates were calculated to supplement the beach volume change rates, with a sediment budget developed as the final product. This is a companion piece to the ERDC/TN RSM-26-1, Conceptual Sediment Budget Creation Using CorpsCam Imagery: Lynnhaven Inlet, Virginia.
  • Conceptual Sediment Budget Creation Using CorpsCam Imagery: Lynnhaven Inlet, Virginia

    Abstract: This Regional Sediment Management technical note (RSM TN) discusses the development of a conceptual sediment budget at Lynnhaven Inlet, Virginia, using CorpsCam imagery. Analysis of imagery collected between September 2022 and July 2024 is used to calculate the volume change along the beaches adjacent to the inlet. The final budget incorporates shoaling change rates and estimated longshore-sediment transport rates. This is a companion piece to the ERDC/TN RSM-26-2 Conceptual Sediment Budget Creation Using CorpsCam Imagery: Holland, Michigan.
  • Projecting the Longevity of Coastal Foredunes Under Stochastic Meteorological and Oceanographic Forcing

    Abstract: Coastal foredunes serve as critical buffers between the ocean and beach-adjacent infrastructure, yet these features are at increasing risk of destruction from future storms and changes in sea level. Quantifying potential future hazards to dunes is complicated by an inability to forecast the exact sequencing and magnitude of future oceanographic and meteorological forcings. We used a stochastic weather emulator capable of generating time series of wind and wave properties to force a reduced complexity morphologic model to assess potential accretional and erosional dune volume changes over the next century. Inclusion of background beach erosion rates and sea level changes instead drives more frequent net volumetric dune erosion. At decadal scales, volume changes of the dune are shown to be dominated by the magnitude of shoreline change rate in locations rapidly retreating. For stable and mildly eroding shorelines, shoreline changes and changes in the still water level influence timescales of dune destruction. Sets of probabilistic simulations are used to show gradual wind-driven sediment gains can compensate for episodic wave-driven losses over the long term. However, in the case of higher sea levels, more frequent dune collision results in less time for dune recovery between major storms.
  • The Quick Response Toolbox User’s Guide

    Abstract: Regional-scale beach morphology, volume, and shoreline changes are quantified using the Joint Airborne Lidar Bathymetry Technical Center of Expertise (JALBTCX) ArcGIS Python toolboxes. This user’s guide details the JALBTCX toolbox framework and the operation of the Quick Response Toolbox. A walkthrough for each individual step within the toolbox will be presented along with example data from Homer, Alaska. Best practices and example data and figures are included as additional documentation for new users.
  • Living Shoreline in USACE Projects: A Review

    Abstract: The term living shoreline (LS) refers to the practice of shoreline stabilization using natural elements (e.g., vegetation, oysters, logs, etc.) in a way that maintains continuity and connectivity between terrestrial and aquatic habitats. This report provides a review of LS practices to assess the applicability of these engineering techniques for US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) projects. Specifically, this review examines the current state of knowledge regarding LS efforts through evaluation of peer-reviewed literature, agency reports, web tools, applications, and relevant guidance. It is important to gain a deeper understanding of the potential ecological, engineering, environmental, and socioeconomic benefits in comparison with traditional gray infrastructure shoreline stabilization techniques. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) encourages the use of LS as a shoreline stabilization technique along sheltered coasts (i.e., coasts not exposed to open ocean wave energy) to preserve and improve habitats and maintain their ecosystem services at the land–water interface. Research has examined aspects of LSs, but there are relevant knowledge gaps yet to be explored. Overall, there is a lot of information from different sources on LSs with limited application to USACE projects. Therefore, a consolidated planning and design consideration report specific to USACE is recommended.
  • Comparison of Run-Up Models with Field Data

    Abstract: Run-up predictions are inherently uncertain, owing to ambiguities in phase-averaged models and inherent complexities of surf and swash-zone hydrodynamics. As a result, different approaches, ranging from simple algebraic expressions to computationally intensive phase-resolving models, have been used in attempt to capture the most relevant run-up processes. Studies quantifiably comparing these methods in terms of physical accuracy and computational speed are needed as new observation technologies and models become available. The current study tests the capability of the new swash formulation of the Coastal Modeling System (CMS) to predict 1D run-up statistics (R2%) collected during an energetic 3 week period on sandy dune-backed beach in Duck, North Carolina. The accuracy and speed of the debut CMS swash formulation is compared with one algebraic model and three other numerical models. Of the four tested numerical models, the CSHORE model computed the results fastest, and the CMS model results had the greatest accuracy. All four numerical models, including XBeach in surfbeat and nonhydrostatic modes, yielded half the error of the algebraic model tested. These findings present an encouraging advancement for phase-averaged coastal models, a critical step towards rapid prediction for near-time deterministic or long-term stochastic guidance.
  • Evaluating Topographic Reconstruction Accuracy of Planet Lab’s Stereo Satellite Imagery

    Abstract: The goal of this Coastal and Hydraulics Engineering Technical Note (CHETN) is to document initial results to derive topography on the beachface in the northern Outer Banks, North Carolina, utilizing Planet Labs’ SkySat stereo panchromatic imagery processed in Agisoft Metashape. This technical note will provide an initial evaluation into whether Planet Lab’s SkySat imagery is a suitable image source for satellite Structure from Motion (SfM) algorithms as well as whether these data should be explored as a federal beach project monitoring tool. Depending on required accuracy, these data have the potential to aid coastal scientists, managers, and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) engineers in understanding the now-state of their coastlines and employ cost-effective adaptive management techniques.
  • Tools and Technical Guidelines for Delineating the Extent of Tidal Waters: Proof of Concept

    Abstract: The delineation of shorelines in tidally influenced waters, as well as the inland extent of tidal influence of those waters, is often used to define the extent of federal and/or state jurisdictional boundaries, including the US Army Corps of Engineers’ (USACE) limits of jurisdiction under the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (RHA) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. At present, USACE and other practitioners use a variety of field observations and desktop-based data sets, tools, and techniques to identify and delineate the lateral and longitudinal extent of USACE’s jurisdiction under the RHA for tidally influenced waters. Tidal waters, and thus federal jurisdiction under the RHA, “end where the rise and fall of the water surface can no longer be practically measured in a predictable rhythm.” However, the technical standards, definitions, and data to delineate tidal extent are also lacking. The uncertainty and ambiguity in what constitute tidal extent increases litigation risk and decreases repeatability and technical defensibility of USACE decisions. Nationally applicable technical guidance and rapid tools and techniques are needed to increase defensibility and consistency across all coastal USACE districts while also accelerating USACE Regulatory decision-making.