Publication Notices

Notifications of New Publications Released by ERDC

Contact Us

      

  

    866.362.3732

   601.634.2355

 

ERDC Library Catalog

Not finding what you are looking for? Search the ERDC Library Catalog

Results:
Tag: Runways (Aeronautics)--Evaluation
Clear
  • Field Study of Nontraditional Airfield Pavements

    Abstract: Airfield pavements in contingency environments might not meet current design standards or might have deteriorated significantly. This study developed performance models for operating C-17 and C-130 aircraft on austere pavements, termed nontraditional airfield pavements. Field evaluations were conducted at six exemplar pavement sections to determine their structural capacity and remaining service life. The structural capacity of these pavement sections was first evaluated using nondestructive and semi-destructive test methods. The evaluations were performed using a single-wheel aircraft-loading simulator operated at two tire inflation pressures while maintaining total aircraft load. Field performance data included sur-face pavement deformation and structural deterioration. Forensic test pits were excavated to document the pavement structural design, material characteristics, and potential failure mechanism. This study found that an expedient contingency operation (100 passes or fewer) of a C-17 could be satisfactorily accomplished, and the service life could be potentially greater for a C-130. Reducing the tire inflation pressure did not always influence the pavements’ performance. The lightweight deflectometer showed potential as a portable pavement-monitoring tool. ERDC developed an improved performance-prediction technique for nontraditional airfield pavements and now propose further implementation to predict service life of other air-field pavement types.
  • Evaluation of the Plate Load Test for Design of Rigid Airfield Pavements Using Various Plate Sizes

    Abstract: This report addresses the state of knowledge of the plate load test and modulus of subgrade reaction (k), industry’s desire to simplify the plate load test, and the effect of the k-value on rigid pavement design. The report traces back the theory behind the k-value over 150 years to evaluate the current state of knowledge. A total of 144 plate load tests were executed on three subgrade materials under varying base course thick-nesses. Plate load testing was designed to evaluate various plate sizes and testing standards (e.g., the military standard CRD-C 655-96 and the ASTM International [commonly called ASTM] standard ASTM D1196-21). By measuring plate load tests on varying base course thicknesses, field-measured effective k-curves were developed. Overall, results show that kASTM was higher than kCRD. Although a smaller plate setup produced similar results, additional variability was introduced when using smaller plates. The results of the field data imply that the current effective k-curves underestimate the global stiffness contribution provided by the base layer. Findings suggest the analytically generated effective k-curves validate the measured k-values in the field.
  • Naval Expeditionary Runway Construction Criteria: Evaluation of Reduced Flexural Strength Portland Cement Concrete under P-8 Traffic

    Abstract: A full-scale airfield pavement test section was constructed and trafficked by the US Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) to investigate the impact of substandard flexural strength portland cement concrete (PCC) on the pavement structural support requirements for the P-8 aircraft. The substandard pavements were representative of those that may be encountered in remote locations where there may be a lack of locally available competent materials, standard construction equipment, or a skilled labor force. The test section consisted of two PCC surface thicknesses that closely matched those evaluated in previous studies utilizing standard-strength PCC. The test items were trafficked with a dual-wheel P-8 test gear on a heavy-vehicle simulator. The outcomes of the trafficking test showed a significant reduction in PCC pavement performance resulting from the reduction in flexural strength. Further, a comparison of observed performance to current pavement design and evaluation procedures suggested that current procedures may be overly conservative and may exceed a level of conservatism appropriate in a contingency environment.
  • Development of an Inertial Profiler Specification for Airfield Pavement Construction

    Abstract: The US Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) developed a test method and specification for measuring the smoothness of newly constructed airfield pavements using the inertial profiler. The limitations inherent in the currently accepted measurement system, the California-type profilograph, are detailed in this report. The effort detailed herein draws attention not only to the superior repeatability of the inertial profiler but also to the device’s ability to report true surface profile more accurately than the California-type profilograph. Correlations were drawn between the two devices with high (greater than 0.8) goodness-of-fit, and recommendations were made pertaining to the use of inertial profilers in place of California-type profilographs. These recommendations were not only founded on the data collected and analyzed in this effort but are also consistent with the current state of practice for other federal agencies, such as the Federal Aviation Administration and the Federal Highway Administration.
  • Naval Expeditionary Runway Construction Criteria: P-8 Poseidon Pavement Requirements

    Abstract: A full-scale airfield pavement test section was constructed and trafficked by the US Army Engineer Research and Development Center to determine minimum rigid and flexible pavement thickness requirements to support contingency operations of the P-8 Poseidon aircraft. Additionally, airfield damage repair solutions were tested to evaluate the compatibility of those solutions with the P-8 Poseidon. The test items consisted of various material thickness and strengths to yield a range of operations to failure allowing development of performance predictions at a relatively lower number of design operations than are considered in traditional sustainment pavement design scenarios. Test items were trafficked with a dual-wheel P-8 test gear on a heavy-vehicle simulator. Flexible pavement rutting, rigid pavement cracking and spalling, instrumentation response, and falling-weight deflectometer data were monitored at select traffic intervals. The results of the trafficking tests indicated that existing design predictions were generally overconservative. Thus, minimum pavement layer thickness recommendations were made to support a minimum level of contingency operations. The results of full-scale flexible pavement experiment were utilized to support an analytical modeling effort to extend flexible pavement thickness recommendations beyond those evaluated.
  • Joint Rapid Airfield Construction (JRAC) Program 2004 Demonstration Project--Fort Bragg, North Carolina

    Abstract: This report describes the demonstration of technologies and procedures developed during April 2002 and May 2004 under the Joint Rapid Airfield Construction (JRAC) Program. The demonstration took place at Sicily Landing Zone (LZ) at Fort Bragg, NC, in July of 2004. The objective of the exercise was to demonstrate the procedures and technologies developed under the JRAC Program by rapidly building two parking aprons capable of supporting C-130 transport aircraft taxiing and parking operations. The exercise was conducted under continuous 24-hr operations to simulate a real-world rapid construction environment. Apron 1 (north apron) was constructed using two technologies, one-half being ACE™ Matting and the other half being a cement-polymer stabilized soil surface. Apron 2 (south apron) was constructed solely of a fiber-cement-stabilized soil system. Both aprons were treated with a polymer emulsion surface application to form a sealed surface against abrasion and water infiltration. The entire construction of both aprons required 76 hr, with Apron 1 finished in 48 hr. The construction of Apron 1 was validated by operation of a C-130 aircraft approximately 31 hr after completion with success and high praises from the aircraft flight crew on the stability and surface of the apron, as well as its dust-abating characteristics.